home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20041116-20060924
/
000316_fdc@columbia.edu_Tue Apr 25 12:19:00 2006.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2006-09-27
|
1KB
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!not-for-mail
From: Frank da Cruz <fdc@columbia.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: speed of script execution
Date: 25 Apr 2006 16:18:35 GMT
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <slrne4siur.2af.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu>
References: <1145524573.729587.320320@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <slrne4f65k.djh.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu> <1145661755.906411.37550@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: fdc@columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: sesame.cc.columbia.edu
X-Trace: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu 1145981915 21759 128.59.59.56 (25 Apr 2006 16:18:35 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: postmaster@columbia.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Apr 2006 16:18:35 GMT
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (SunOS)
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:15573
On 2006-04-21, tomviolin <rock_spambust_violin@yahoo.com> wrote:
: ...
: It would appear that the "close" statement is the culprit. Why? And
: why does it delay only for testx.ksc and not testy.ksc?
:
Closing a serial port can take time, depending on the driver -- maybe it's
waiting for some modem signals to react. As to why it takes longer in
a block than at top level, I confess, I haven't a clue. I'll try to find
time to look at this but if you run across anything else in the meantime
let me know.
- Frank